On Feb 23, 2012 8:10 AM, "Cameron Byrne" <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 23, 2012 5:05 AM, "Rémi Després" <despres.r...@laposte.net> wrote: > > > > > > Le 2012-02-23 à 12:03, liu dapeng a écrit : > > > > > Hi Med, > > > > > > I think it is still not clear about the definition of "stateless", in > > > current draft, it says: > > > > > > stateless denotes a solution which does not require any per-user state > > > (see Section > > > 2.3 of [RFC1958]) to be maintained by any IP address sharing > > > function in the Service Provider's network. > > > > > > But all the candidate solutions: MAP-T/MAP-E/4rd-U all need to maitain > > > state in CPE. > > > > Hi Liu, > > > > Even in mesh topologies, these solutions don't require CPEs to maintain states about other CPEs to communicate directly with them. > > In this sense, they are stateless, including with the given definition. > > OK? > > > > Correct me if I am wrong, but at leas map-t requires stateful nat44 at the cpe >
Never mind. Please excuse me not reading enough about the definition before sending. Cb > Cb > > > regards, > > RD > > > > > > > > > > > It is obviously contradictory with this definition. We > > > need more discussion regarding the definition of "stateless". > > > > > > regards, > > > Dapeng Liu > > > > > > 2012/2/20, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com >: > > >> Dear chairs, WG members, > > >> > > >> The answers received so far are in favour of initiating a WG LC on this > > >> document. > > >> > > >> As an editor of the document, I would like to progress this document for the > > >> next IETF meeting. Chairs, could you please issue the WG LC? Thanks. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Med > > >> > > >>> -----Message d'origine----- > > >>> De : francis.dup...@fdupont.fr [mailto:francis.dup...@fdupont.fr] > > >>> Envoyé : samedi 11 février 2012 09:30 > > >>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP > > >>> Cc : softwires@ietf.org > > >>> Objet : Re: [Softwires] Closing > > >>> draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation > > >>> > > >>> In your previous mail you wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> (1) Either issue a WG LC, or > > >>> > > >>> +1 > > >>> > > >>> francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > > >>> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Softwires mailing list > > >> Softwires@ietf.org > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > ------ > > > Best Regards, > > > Dapeng Liu > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Softwires mailing list > > > Softwires@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > Softwires@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
