On Feb 23, 2012 5:05 AM, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Le 2012-02-23 à 12:03, liu dapeng a écrit :
>
> > Hi Med,
> >
> > I think it is still not clear about the definition of "stateless", in
> > current draft, it says:
> >
> > stateless denotes a solution which does not require any per-user state
> > (see Section
> > 2.3 of [RFC1958]) to be maintained by any IP address sharing
> > function in the Service Provider's network.
> >
> > But all the candidate solutions: MAP-T/MAP-E/4rd-U all need to maitain
> > state in CPE.
>
> Hi Liu,
>
> Even in mesh topologies, these solutions don't require CPEs to maintain
states about other CPEs to communicate directly with them.
> In this sense, they are stateless, including with the given definition.
> OK?
>

Correct me if I am wrong, but at leas map-t requires stateful nat44 at the
cpe

Cb
> regards,
> RD
>
>
>
>
> > It is obviously contradictory with this definition. We
> > need more discussion regarding the definition of "stateless".
> >
> > regards,
> > Dapeng Liu
> >
> > 2012/2/20, [email protected] <[email protected]>:
> >> Dear chairs, WG members,
> >>
> >> The answers received so far are in favour of initiating a WG LC on this
> >> document.
> >>
> >> As an editor of the document, I would like to progress this document
for the
> >> next IETF meeting. Chairs, could you please issue the WG LC? Thanks.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Med
> >>
> >>> -----Message d'origine-----
> >>> De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> Envoyé : samedi 11 février 2012 09:30
> >>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
> >>> Cc : [email protected]
> >>> Objet : Re: [Softwires] Closing
> >>> draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation
> >>>
> >>> In your previous mail you wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> (1) Either issue a WG LC, or
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Softwires mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > ------
> > Best Regards,
> > Dapeng Liu
> > _______________________________________________
> > Softwires mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to