2012/4/3, Wojciech Dec <wdec.i...@gmail.com>: > On 2 April 2012 19:10, Rémi Després <despres.r...@laposte.net> wrote: > >> >> >> > Woj> Well, in terms of facts we have >> > 1. 4rd-U does not supporting single translation mode, >> >> Not claimed to. >> > > It's good to get clarity now that previous 4rd-U claims of supporting > services such as web-caching, log-on-portals, etc. are now false, and no > longer claimed. MAP(-T) continues to allow these.
I don't see the difference between 4rd-U and MAP-T on this pionts. BTW, woj, do you really see the value of supporting single translation. I guess that is not targeting scenario for Softwires wg. IMHO, this single translation is not sufficient in the wild. It's only applicable for a subset of IPv6 address (i.e. IPv4-converted addresses communicating with IPv4-translatable addresses) BRs Gang _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
