Remi, >> (please don't respond to these, FYI only. I'm on Easter holiday.) > > Asking that a list of objections shouldn't be answered is to me very unusual!
it was to remind you of the problems with 4rd-U. we have been many rounds on these exact arguments, and I don't see the point of rehashing the discussion. we're going to continue to have different views on the new use of u/g, the overloading of fragmentation, and that double translation can replace tunneling. I'd rather see arguments from non-authors. (this reminds me of cockfighting; somewhat entertaining for the spectators (if that's your kind of thing), one is declared a winner, but both combatants die... cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
