Hi Maoke, Woj, Two points.
On 2012/06/27, at 17:43, Wojciech Dec wrote: > Question #7: this text is contradictory with Section 7.1. is the DHCP option > a sort of "other means" or not, or there's something out of scope of this > draft? > > Woj> DHCP is a provisioning mechanism which MAP *can* use, but nothing in the > architecture prevents any other provisioning mechanisms to be used incl > dhcpv4, snmp, etc. In addition, any provisioning protocol could be used in MAP. But using these protocol in LW46 basis, DHCPv4-over-IPv6 and PCP in particular, absolutely out of scope for MAP. > > Question #8: what is the consequence of disabling the NAT44 functionality on > CE when a subscriber having a PSID of a share IPv4 address is running behind > that CE as a 1:1 mode domain? > > Woj> That is not possible. We can be clearer in saying that if the CPE has > no IPv4 address configured then NAT44 is to be disabled (kind of obvious) Described text for '1:1 mode' in current version would make some people confused. We need to make clear for that. cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
