Satoru - Described text for '1:1 mode' in current version would make some 
people confused. We need to make clear for that.

I am also not in favor of the concept of '1:1 mode'. A special mode is called 
here.

I guess it doesn't mean length (EA bits in End-User IPv6 prefix) = 0.

1:1 might just mean length (Rule IPv4 prefix of BMR) = 32, 

that is a full public IPv4 address is associated with a Rule IPv6 prefix, but 
this public IPv4 address is definitely for sharing with different PSID. Right?


Best Regards,
Leaf


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Satoru Matsushima
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:57 PM
To: Wojciech Dec
Cc: Softwires-wg
Subject: Re: [Softwires] map-00: review on the mode 1:1

Hi Maoke, Woj,

Two points.

On 2012/06/27, at 17:43, Wojciech Dec wrote:

> Question #7: this text is contradictory with Section 7.1. is the DHCP option 
> a sort of "other means" or not, or there's something out of scope of this 
> draft? 
> 
> Woj> DHCP is a provisioning mechanism which MAP *can* use, but nothing in the 
> architecture prevents any other provisioning mechanisms to be used incl 
> dhcpv4, snmp, etc.

In addition, any provisioning protocol could be used in MAP. But using these 
protocol in LW46 basis, DHCPv4-over-IPv6 and PCP in particular, absolutely out 
of scope for MAP.


> 
> Question #8: what is the consequence of disabling the NAT44 functionality on 
> CE when a subscriber having a PSID of a share IPv4 address is running behind 
> that CE as a 1:1 mode domain? 
> 
> Woj>  That is not possible.  We can be clearer in saying that if the CPE has 
> no IPv4 address configured then NAT44 is to be disabled (kind of obvious)

Described text for '1:1 mode' in current version would make some people 
confused. We need to make clear for that.

cheers,
--satoru
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to