Ian, > And two comments on section 4.5: > This section is entirely MAP specific, although the sub-option is generally > applicable to all of the containers.
while I think it is fine that it refers to the "MAP algorithm", I agree it shouldn't refer to "MAP interface". would you have a go at more generic text? > The default value of 6 for the ‘offset’ field either shouldn’t be specified > here, or should have ‘6’ for MAP and ‘0’ for lw4o6. we might not need to include that in the map-dhcp document, since it is already in map base. btw, is '0' a wise choice for LW46? I don't see any evaluation or recommendations in the LW46 document about what to do with a PSID of 0 and an offset of 0. try sourcing a few packets from TCP port 25 to random picked destination, to understand my point. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
