Hi Rajiv, Please see inline.
Cheers, Ian On 1 May 2014, at 21:03, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) <raj...@cisco.com> wrote: > > UmmŠthat doesn¹t cut it either, since softwire node will always have to > formulate the 32-bit IPv4 address even if < /32 is conveyed. Also, > Software interface is not defined anywhere in this document. > > How about the following - > [ian] Incomplete suggestion, or are you saying it should be removed? > -- > Cheers, > Rajiv Asati > Distinguished Engineer, Cisco >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires