Ian, thanks!
> [ian] Couple of changes to 4.5: > > Old: > The Port Parameters Option specifies optional Rule Port Parameters > that MAY be provided as part of the Mapping Rule for CEs using the > MAP algorithm. > New: > The Port Parameters Option specifies optional Port Set information > that MAY be provided to CEs. that looks fine. > Old: > When receiving the Port Parameters option with an explicit PSID, the > client MUST use this explicit PSID in configuring its MAP interface. > If the conveyed IPv4 address is not 32 bit-long, the option MUST be > discarded. The formula for this check is "prefix4-len + ea-len = 32" > and serves to ensure that the explicit PSID is only applied to > configurations with a completely formed IPv4 address. > New: > On receipt of the Port Parameters option with an explicit PSID, clients > MUST configure their softwire interface with the received > explicit PSID. For MAP-E and MAP-T clients, if the conveyed IPv4 address > is not 32 bits-long, the option MUST be discarded. The formula for > this check is "prefix4-len + ea-len = 32" and serves to ensure that > the explicit PSID is only applied to configurations with a completely > formed IPv4 address. what about keeping the old text with your change of s/MAP interface/softwire interface/. at least in theory LW46 could support IPv4 prefixes, or a new mechanism could come along that did. > [ian] > What about the following wording change: > Old:Allowed values are between 0 and 15, with the default value being 6. > New: > Allowed values are between 0 and 15. Default values for this field are > specific to the softwire mechanism being implemented and are defined in the > relevant specification document. that looks fine. updated. > Good spot on the WKP exclusion. Before the lw4o6 draft was updated to > reference map-dhcp for configuration, the port configuration was described > in sun-dhc-port-set-option, which also stated that the WKPs should not be > assigned. This advice got lost when changing to reference map-dhcp. I’ll make > a suggested text update for the lw4o6 draft to fix this. Does that work for > you? yes, that would be good. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
