UmmŠthat doesn¹t cut it either, since softwire node will always have to
formulate the 32-bit IPv4 address even if < /32 is conveyed.  Also,
Software interface is not defined anywhere in this document.

 How about the following -


-- 
Cheers,
Rajiv Asati
Distinguished Engineer, Cisco





-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Farrer <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, April 25, 2014 at 8:42 AM
To: Ole Troan <[email protected]>
Cc: Softwires-wg list <[email protected]>, Yong Cui
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Working group last call for
draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-07

>Hi Ole,
>
>So the whole paragraph would read:
>
>When receiving the Port Parameters option with an explicit PSID, the
>client MUST use this explicit PSID in configuring its softwire interface.
>The Port Parameters option with an explicit PSID MUST be discarded
>if the softwire node isn't configured with a full IPv4 address (e.g. IPv4
>prefix).
>
>If so, fine with me.
>
>Cheers,
>Ian
>
>On 24 Apr 2014, at 10:15, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ian,
>> 
>>> When receiving the Port Parameters option with an explicit PSID, the
>>> client MUST use this explicit PSID in configuring its softwire
>>>interface.
>>> If the client¹s IPv4 address (configured via a separate sub-option)
>>> is not 32 bit-long, the Port Parameters option MUST be discarded.
>>> For MAP-E and MAP-T clients, the formula for the address length check
>>> is "prefix4-len + ea-len = 32² and serves to ensure that  the explicit
>>> PSID is only applied to configurations with a completely formed IPv4
>>>address.
>> 
>> I don't like the implications that IPv4 address can be != 32 bits. ;-)
>> 
>> just simply:
>> 
>> The Port Parameters option with an explicit PSID MUST be discarded if
>>the softwire node isn't configured with a full IPv4 address (e.g. IPv4
>>prefix).
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Ole
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Softwires mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to