-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Malte S. Stretz writes: >On Monday 05 January 2004 08:58 CET Justin Mason wrote: >> hmm -- that's a good point, there's still some stuff in 2.6x contrib >> and build dirs that aren't CLA'd, maybe we should start stripping it >> out *there* too. > >As we will release 2.62 still under the GPL/PAL (I think?), I don't know if >this is really needed. Actually, all that stuff is still available in the >CVS/SVN repository so if one wants be be really picky we'd had to get CLAs >from everybody who every contributed if we really needed to cover >everything which went to the ASF repositories. (IMHO & IANAL) > >> if I recall correctly, the only "mainline" functionality we'll lose >> is the Horde modifications to customise in detail what the SQL >> statement is for SpamAssassin SQL prefs; they didn't provide a >> CLA. Most other stuff is extraneous, like translations, >> language-specific rules, build tools and contrib stuff. > >I don't like the idea of removing (or adding) any feature on a bugfix >release. Good point. OK, let's stick with doing 2.6x from sf.net CVS instead. It's a little more tiresome, but ASF-izing 2.6x in the meantime would be harder all-in-all and require intrusive changes. Sorry for the confusion -- I've killed too many brain cells while on holidays ;) (plus I'm still a little jetlagged, honest) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQE/+bH7QTcbUG5Y7woRAuMXAJ9jFaXd8etDejYG2HCd53ZPrOsbcwCeJjM/ BpqpT9Bkrf8nO9ny5YgemBE= =+k5L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
