On Sat, 01 May 2004 10:34:23 -0400, you wrote:

[omitted]

>>I'm sorry, but you're prone to making complaints, but failed to give 
>details. This whole controversy would have been a lot shorter if you'd 
>pointed out exactly what you were talking about at the start. As a result, 
>you and I have wasted a lot of our time arguing over something that isn't 
>the problem. Next time, don't waste your time or mine. Tell us what your 
>exact problem is.


1) I'm reasonably certain that you've confused me with the original
poster. Want to check the from names next time?

2) It so happens that I know of 2 so-called ISPs who have my DSL line
blocked - AOL and roadrunner - which is why I think the idea of
blacklisting based on IP address with no other cause is stupid.  Wait
until someone sends spam before calling them a spammer, is my point.

Mike-

--
If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough.
--
Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide 
spam filters at catherders.com.  If
email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
      • ... jdow
      • ... John Fawcett
        • ... Michael W . Cocke
          • ... spamassassin-users-return-7889-apmail-incubator-spamassassin-users-archive=incubator . apache . org
      • ... Kai Schaetzl
  • ... Scott Rothgaber
  • ... Michael W . Cocke
    • ... Matt Kettler
    • ... Kai Schaetzl
  • ... Scott Williams
  • ... Kai Schaetzl

Reply via email to