From: "Michael W.Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, 1 May 2004 16:02:30 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Michael W.Cocke"
> >> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:32:48 -0400, you wrote:
> >>
> >> >At 05:23 PM 4/30/04 -0500, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> >> >> > Could you perhaps be more specific about your problem? being
> >> >> > "considered a spammer" isn't a very specific problem
> >> >>Brett Miller explained it logically. My major complaint was that
dial
> >> >>up users are considered as possible spamers if I were sending spam I
> >> >>would at least have a direct connection to the net.
> >> >
> >> >That's untrue.. dialup users are considered potentially spammers IF
they
> >> >don't relay via their ISP's mailserver.
> >>
> >> and what (he asked with a straight face) are we supposed to do if our
> >> so-called ISPs don't offer a mail server?
> >
> >Can you give an example of an ISP in this situation?
>
> Believe it or not, AT&T business DSL doesn't offer mail services (or
> DNS service) unless you spring for the 5 IP address plan - which costs
> $50.00 per month more than the single IP plan that I use. I would
> have to use their webmail system if I wanted to use their mail server.
> Not going to happen.
I believe pobox.com is a good deal cheaper. And AT&T caters to spammers
anyway so it might be a good idea to move away from them.
{^_^}
