>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:21 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: blacklist brings system to halt > > >On Monday, June 28, 2004, 7:12:29 AM, William Nichols wrote: >> Are you running out of memory? With the sa-blacklist.cf I see when >> spamd kicks on it takes about 93MB of memory, without it the >memory used >> is about 43MB. This is with about 10 other rulesets turned >on in both >> cases. > >> I just used the -m switch and kept spamd limited to 5 processes. > >> Bill > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Anne Ramey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> I recently added >> #sa-blacklist: 200406241030 >> #This list provided by William Stearns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >please send >> #additions and corrections. >> #The master copy is kept at: >> #http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current.cf >> #Some of the following may be trademarks, owned by their respective >> owners. > >> and it brought my system to a screeching halt. Mail barely dripped >> through. There were no errors and no lost mail, it just >took forever >> to process mail. Has anyone else experienced this? > >> Anne > >You both may want to try the SURBL version of sa-blacklist, >ws.surbl.org, which should use much less memory since it >gets most of the domains as a DNS zone file. > > http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#ws > >Jeff C. >-- >Jeff Chan >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.surbl.org/
Actually I think sa-blacklist.current.cf should be removed forever. Bigevil.cf is now the same thing, only in a better format. I see no reason to use sa-blacklist.current.cf anymore. Either use SURBL lookups of Bigevil.cf. Actually it is bigevil2.cf right now. I haven't officially move bigevil2.cf to bigevil.cf. Barring no major problems reported, I will do that this Friday. --Chris
