On Monday 28 June 2004 09:20 am, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Monday, June 28, 2004, 7:12:29 AM, William Nichols wrote:
> > Are you running out of memory?  With the sa-blacklist.cf I see when
> > spamd kicks on it takes about 93MB of memory, without it the memory
> > used is about 43MB.  This is with about 10 other rulesets turned on in
> > both cases.
> >
> > I just used the -m switch and kept spamd limited to 5 processes.
> >
> > Bill
>
> You both may want to try the SURBL version of sa-blacklist,
> ws.surbl.org, which should use much less memory since it
> gets most of the domains as a DNS zone file.
>
>   http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#ws
>
> Jeff C.

Bill and others, I managed to cut my processing time down from an average of 
60 - 80 seconds to between 3 and 18 seconds by removing the large rule 
files, disabling auto_learn.  Jeff, question for you, can the ws_uri.cf be 
used in place of the blacklist_uri.cf?  If so, or if I can get by with just 
the ws_uri.cf file I'm sure more processing time can be cut.  I also have 
network checks enabled and am using razor/pyzor and dcc.  I've got a total 
of 15 rulesets I use now down from the 46 I was using about 2 weeks ago and 
have yet to see a FN or FP

-- 
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
7:31pm up 1 day, 49 min, 2 users, load average: 0.37, 0.40, 0.37
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Men will always be men -- no matter where they are.
                -- Harry Mudd, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1329.8
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Live - From Virgin Radio UK Virgin Radio Classic Tracks - The original 
classic rock station

Reply via email to