On Tuesday 29 June 2004 08:29 pm, Jeff Chan wrote: > > Jeff, question for you, can the ws_uri.cf be > > used in place of the blacklist_uri.cf? If so, or if I can get by with > > just the ws_uri.cf file I'm sure more processing time can be cut. I > > also have network checks enabled and am using razor/pyzor and dcc. > > If blacklist_uri.cf is using Bill Stearns' sa-blacklist and > ws_uri.cf is using ws.surbl.org with SpamCopURI or urirhsbl > to check message body URIs, then yes, you can replace the former > with the latter and save a lot of SA memory and probably gain > significant performance. > > Please give it a try and let us know how it works for you: > > http://www.surbl.org/ > > You may want to do some benchmarks or gather some stats > about delays through your mail system before and after > if you want to try to measure a difference. > > Jeff C.
Thanks Jeff, I'll do that. Since I get an hourly output of certain events in my syslog and I'm using sa-stats it shouldn't be too hard to see if a difference if made. I'll let you and the list know. -- Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 8:49pm up 1 day, 2:07, 2 users, load average: 0.72, 0.83, 0.73 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yow! I just went below the poverty line! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Live - From Virgin Radio UK Virgin Radio Classic Tracks - The original classic rock station
