Yes, the Analyst API is faster than the WiffFileDataReader API, but it requires specific versions of
Analyst to be installed which are not freely available by any stretch of the imagination.
-Matt
On 1/25/2011 9:26 AM, Nathan Edwards wrote:
More grist for the mill with respect to mzWiff, while I get a crash
with the -c flag, if I used -c1 -c (MS and MS/MS centroiding), no
crash.
With respect to other discussions, mzWiff outputs in cycle major order
(all experiments of each cycle in order), as opposed to msconvert and
the ABI tool.
Furthermore, mzWiff's conversion time for my test case wiff/wiff.scan
file (15 sample file of approximately 27K spectra, about 120Mb .wiff/
wiff.scan file, no peak detection) is about the same as for msconvert
(about 10mins each) despite the cycle major order of output.
- n
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
