Excellent point- or really, observation of impending reality.

The Forum's constable pointed out in a recent email that WHEN the IRC adopts
SFD, EVERY SPKR COMPANY WOULD HAVE TO INSTALL SYSTEMS IN ABOUT 350 SFD's A
YEAR. And it is very likely that's 2 years away. If not, its 5 with a
smattering of locals floating in intermittently.

Any of you ready for another 350 systems a year- even if you did the 13d EZ
calcs? At only 10 heads each, and $100/hd, that's another $3.5m in volume
you'd have to ramp up for- are you on schedule to get the crews and design
for that ready? If its 20 heads each @ $200/hd that'd be $14m- that gives
you a range for house sizes and market variances. 

And that's every single sprinkler contractor in the country. While SAC or
Western States can handle that company wide, there are a lot of mom and pops
that are going to blink and see plumbers lining up to do hotels and apts and
all because we created a market and didn't service it.

glc


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 5:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ICC Version of 13d

All:

About 8 or 9 years ago, a former fire chief turned residential sprinkler
advocate coined the Phrase, "The plumbers are coming!"    He and I joked
back then about the "Chicken Little" parable and he was predictably
ridiculed and criticized - sometimes not so quietly - in some corners of
the fire sprinkler community.   But Pat Coughlin was right; starting
with the introduction of the Wirsbo pre-engineered MP system, there has
been steady movement in the cycling of 13D and the adopted Plumbing and
Residential Codes toward homogenizing plumbing and residential sprinkler
systems.   Pat was a founder and Executive Director of both the
Residential Fire Sprinkler Institute an Operation Life Safety, as well
as FPC's Man of The Year in 2000, I think.  Pat introduced me to the
management of Wirsbo at the launch of their AquaSafe system and I have
been watching the evolution of the residential market with keen interest
ever since.   And over the course of this period of time, with so many
changes in product technologies, changes in U.L. listings, unbelievable
growth in the market, adoption of new model codes, etc., there has been
one rock-steady and unchanging constant.   That being the
institutionalized denial of these changes by many (most?) in the
sprinkler industry.

Does anyone on this forum really think that we - the entire unified
industry - can possibly address all of the new work that will be created
if IRC adopts mandatory sprinklers for one and two family homes?
Folks, there are people in our industry right now bidding tract-sized
SFD's at $3-4 per s.f. AND HIGHER.   Homebuilders are screaming bloody
murder nationwide; between the cost of 1" meters and the apparent lack
of interested bidders, they can't seem to buy residential sprinklers
anywhere near the $1-2 per s.f. we've been saying for years they should
pay.   Our industry claims to want mandatory residential sprinkler codes
but we haven't done squat about building our infrastructure, growing our
human and technological resources or preparing for a wave of new
business that could double the size of our industry in some markets
OVERNIGHT.   And because we haven't done a damned thing, the market
should wait around for us to pull our heads out of the sand?   No, the
market is going to do what all free enterprise markets have done
throughout the history of this country: it's going to follow the path of
least resistance.  Does anyone think that these large residential
plumbing and HVAC contractors are $150 million companies by accident?
Does anyone reading this think that SFD systems are so complicated that
we're all really glad they made us take calculus in high school and
college?   Any particular reason why a 13D design has never been
confused with a booster rocket?  Yeah - 'cause it AIN'T.

Homebuilders control a 1/3 stake in the IRC, if I'm not mistaken.  The
most pragmatic among them realize that if it's not this cycle, it will
likely be next cycle, but sprinklers in SFD's are inevitable.   So
(unlike our community) they're getting their wagons into a preemptive
circle.   And I've got some really bad news for those who are
organically opposed to the notion that anyone but a dedicated sprinkie
can/should be the installer of record for a residential sprinkler
system.  Not only are there multi-purpose design guidelines proposed in
the IRC, but I encourage everyone to check out 13D, Log #50 (Item 54) of
the current residential cycle.   It's a prescriptive (i.e. pipe
scheduled) table design method for sprinkler systems in SFD's and the
committee's vote in ROP was a resounding "accept".   The tables
recommended for adoption are the same ones proposed for and used to
substantiate the IRC design basis, and would further harmonize the IRC,
IPC and 13D.   

Note to self: The Plumbers are coming ... and they have dollar-signs in
their eyes.  

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting

[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to