Right, i believe we arw on thw samw page. The escutcheon does not need to be rates according to the exception in the building code. Show the AHJ the code section and explain that the escutcheon is not assigned a rating since it is approved by the code to be installed in this manner.
As for the pipe material... I would have to dig into the code that is not in front of me right now. But it does not sound like that is an issue with your inspector. Good Luck Justin D. Reid, P.E. RLH Fire Protection 16735 Saticoy St. #110 Van Nuys, CA 91406 213-798-0251 Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2009, at 11:59 AM, "Bobby Gillett" <[email protected] > wrote: > I do understand the process for the back side of the wall. I'm not > trying to > get out of fire caulking anything. I do not see how a semi-recessed, > concealed, etc. sprinkler with listed escutcheon in a rated wall can > be > sealed on the sprinkler side. > > Please keep in mind this started with the AHJ wanting to know the fire > rating of the escutcheon. > > Bobby Gillett > Sr. Project Manager > Key Fire Protection, Inc. > (731) 424-0130 office (731) 424-9285 fax > (731) 267-4853 cell > [email protected] > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Sprinkler > Forum > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Rating of the sprinkler escutcheon > > Keep in mind that th exception in the code is assuming the sprinkler > head has activated therefore preventing direct flame impingement. > > The sprinkler spray argument goes away on the back side of the wall > though. > > Rather than debate whether cpvc is combustible or not with your AHJ, > you should transition to steel, and caulk the penetration on the back > side of the wall. Let the opening on the inside of the stair fall > under the exception in the code. > > > Justin D. Reid, P.E. > RLH Fire Protection > 16735 Saticoy St. #110 > Van Nuys, CA 91406 > 213-798-0251 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 28, 2009, at 11:08 AM, "Bobby Gillett" > <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> How do you propose fire rating the penetration when you have a HSW or >> pendent in a ceiling? Especially concealed or semi recessed. >> >> Bobby Gillett >> Sr. Project Manager >> Key Fire Protection, Inc. >> (731) 424-0130 office (731) 424-9285 fax >> (731) 267-4853 cell >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> [email protected] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:03 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: RE: Rating of the sprinkler escutcheon >> >> Well, that's a lot of fancy words that don't say non-combustible. >> >> Some pipe won't sustain combustion without direct flame impingement, >> so >> maybe that's what they meant when they said it wasn't combustible. >> But it >> also won't retain it's shape and when that occurs you have a breach >> in the >> rated wall. >> >> Easiest thing to do is if you have to go through a rated wall, >> transition to >> steel and fire caulk it at the penetrations and be done with it. >> Why debate >> it? >> >> Craig L. Prahl, CET >> Fire Protection Specialist >> Mechanical Department >> CH2MHILL >> Lockwood Greene >> 1500 International Drive >> PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 >> Direct - 864.599.4102 >> Fax - 864.599.8439 >> [email protected] >> http://www.ch2m.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Thomas Watt >> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:56 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Rating of the sprinkler escutcheon >> >> >> >>> From the Lubrizol website... >> >> The flame spread and smoke generation characteristics of TempRite >> CPVC >> materials have been evaluated by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. >> (ULI), >> Southwest Research Institute (SWRI), and Factory Mutual (FM) >> employing a >> number of recognized test methods. >> >> ULI evaluated TempRite CPVC for flammability in accordance with UL >> 94, which >> is used for determining the flammability of plastic materials used >> in the >> components and parts of finished products. This test measures a >> material's >> resistance to burning, dripping, glow emission and burn through. >> CPVC has >> achieved the highest rating available within the scope of this test >> of V0, >> 5VB and 5VA. >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Greg McGahan" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:31 PM >> Subject: RE: Rating of the sprinkler escutcheon >> >> >> When I called Lubrizol they indicated that the cpvc should be >> considered >> non-combustible UNLESS I totally misunderstood them (very possible >> this >> week). >> >> Greg McGahan >> Operations Manager >> >> Living Water Fire Protection >> 1160 McKenzie Road >> P.O. Box 877 >> Cantonment, Florida 32533 >> (850) 937.1850 | Fax (850) 937.1852 | Cell (850) 554.3231 >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] >> >> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] >> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] >> >> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] >> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] >> >> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] >> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
