Oh and how do you spray the inside of the pipe where the weld occurred?
This assumes the galv. is effected on the inside at the weld which may not
be true. 

Chris 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:59 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

How exactly are you going to re-galv?  Is spray paint really galvanization?

Always puzzled me why one (client/PE) would on smaller pipe insist on
cutting most of the materials off in the threading process over roll
grooving and preserving most of the wall thickness.  Seems to me grooving
with all things being equal would last longer than threading.  

Can any one shed light on OK to groove larger pipe but must thread smaller?
2" seem to be the break point.  Applies to both galv and black, again all
things being equal.    

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Davis, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets


The client has agreed to use grooved connection for the 6" main but not for
the 2".  It seems the practical solution is to use TOLs and re-galvanize to
save on field labor and cost.  I'm unfamiliar with galvanized pipe so the
forum's input has been helpful.  Thanks


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

Is there a requirement to use threaded versus grooved?  

If you have corrosion issues the "clamp fittings" aren't galvanized so they
could corrode so it's logical that you'd avoid them. 

If you are threading pipe, the field install labor would be less if you have
the thread-o-let in the main.  From a materials cost the TOL would also come
out cheaper, from all areas of installation the TOL would be cheaper.  Sure
the shop labor would be more for the TOL but that would have to be greatly
offset by the other savings in labor and materials.

Also I hope you don't intend to ask for 6" threaded pipe, 2" will get enough
frowns.




Craig L. Prahl

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Davis, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

I have a 6" galvanized main and have to come off with 40 2" branch lines.
I'm trying to determine the least costly way to transition to the 2" branch
lines.  The two options I have are using 6"x2" threaded reducer tee or 2"
thread-o-let and re-galvanizing the weld.  The client requires galvanized
pipe and does not want to use mechanical clamp fittings.  Any suggestions to
which method is the least expensive? 

 

Thanks

Adam Davis


NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged
information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing,
copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged
information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing,
copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to