No the mech tees weren't the only thing that made it look like junk and no I 
don't think there's anything wrong with using them in the proper application, 
but for a new install I don't believe the whole system should be done that way. 
  It made it look like a second class install.


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

"Installation looked like @#$%!.  BTW: this wasn't in the U.S.   This could
have been the basis for a book on how not to install sprinkler systems, and it 
would have been a BIG book."

You seem to link this thought to the mech tee discussion.  I'm assuming it 
didn't look like this just BECAUSE of mech tees.  There were other things that 
made it look like @#$%!?

In theory the method you described isn't inherently wrong, right?  And no 
that's not our style and didn't do this one and have never done one like that 
(at least yet).  

Guess I'm just curious today.  

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

A lot of new installs will not want to see mech. tees.  The impression is that 
someone just slapped together the system and it doesn't appear that they 
thought about fabrication and this is a field routed system, not engineered.

For renovations or minor system alterations they are generally accepted without 
question.  

I just saw a project with several hundred thousand sq. ft. under roof where all 
the outlets were mech. tees basically because the contractor gets bulk pipe 
shipped to the site, they cut to length and put outlets where they think 
necessary regardless of what was shown on the design drawings.  No real 
fabrication at all.  Threading machine and a groover on site with a few 
port-a-bands and they are set to go.  Installation looked like @#$%!.  BTW:
this wasn't in the U.S.   This could have been the basis for a book on how
not to install sprinkler systems, and it would have been a BIG book.



Craig L. Prahl


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 12:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

If as you say the client doesn't want galvanized clamp on tees, which I 
consider the best solution, the other consideration is installation labor.
6" threaded is a lot of labor in the air, and difficult to repair a leak at 
test time. Before I went that route I'd sure look at 6x6x2" GV tees.

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 8:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

What's the client's basis for not allowing "mechanical clamp fittings"?
By far the best way to do this would be to cut saddles in the field.
By far - no galvanized welding issues, no threading ...  way too easy.

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting
San Diego, CA




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Davis, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 6:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Galvanized pipe - threaded reducer tees vs. thread-o-lets

I have a 6" galvanized main and have to come off with 40 2" branch lines.
I'm trying to determine the least costly way to transition to the 2"
branch
lines.  The two options I have are using 6"x2" threaded reducer tee or 2"
thread-o-let and re-galvanizing the weld.  The client requires galvanized pipe 
and does not want to use mechanical clamp fittings.  Any suggestions to which 
method is the least expensive? 

 

Thanks

Adam Davis


NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information 
that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or 
distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify 
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
[email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4067 (20090512) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4068 (20090512) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to