I would bet not. My opinion is that the largest cause of the water "migration" 
in an anti-freeze system is the result of thermal expansion/contraction of the 
volume of the fluid. If the pressure differential at the check valve is 
sufficient, dilution by migration should be minimal. 

Mark at Aero
602 820-7894

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 13, 2014, at 10:42 AM, "Mark A. Sornsin, P.E." <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> So as the N2 is absorbed by the antifreeze, is there any loss of volume (and 
> subsequent reduction in pressure) in the piping that would allow water to 
> migrate into the AF lines? If so, how much? Or does the 'Nitrogenated' AF 
> solution simply expand to occupy the space held by the pure N2 under the same 
> pressure?
> 
> Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection Engineer 
> | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 | 
> http://www.kfiengineers.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Antifreeze-recipe for disaster?
> 
> I would bet the nitrogen never "leaks out of the system", based on Henry's 
> Law, as the nitrogen dissolves into solution under pressure. And by using 
> nitrogen as the pressurizing agent, no increase in oxidation (corrosion) is 
> imparted. I'm aware that nitrogen has been used to pressurize sprinkler 
> piping for various reasons for at least thirty years.
> Mark at Aero
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Mark A. Sornsin, P.E.
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Antifreeze-recipe for disaster?
> 
> C'mon, Todd.  WHY is he the missing link?
> 
> 
> ...because there is no way of know with certainty how much water will enter 
> the AF piping after all of the N2 eventually leaks out. The presents the 
> possibility of a freezable AF system. I suppose one could calculate the exact 
> volume of the AF piping and measure the exact amount of AF pumped into the 
> system prior to charging with N2, proving that the water couldn't migrate too 
> far.... I would hope that approach was well documented prior to the freeze 
> event and lawsuit.
> 
> Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection Engineer 
> | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 | 
> http://www.kfiengineers.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Todd Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Antifreeze-recipe for disaster?
> 
> No, but I think the guy that did it is the missing link.
> 
> Todd G Williams, PE
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> Stonington, CT
> 860-535-2080
> www.fpdc.com
> 
> 
>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Thomas Watt <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I recently encountered a scenario which I felt this group would enjoy
>> chewing on.
>> While draining an AF system to replace another leaking(@brass/steel
>> interface) no-torque head adapter, huge bursts of mist, aerosolized
>> glycerin mix, came out.
>> It seems that this company has an s.o.p. of pumping af into dead end
>> system(no purge) using a cheap pump which only permits about 50psi.
>> They then jack the system pressure above static with compressed nitrogen.
>> Has anybody ever seen this done before? Am I off base here or is this
>> possibly the missing link?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>> er.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to