How about AWWA?
Mike

> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Ductile Iron Fittings
> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 20:52:14 +0000
> 
> B16.4 is for gray iron which I think is the most common form for fire 
> sprinkler system above ground threaded fittings. 
> 
> I'm attempting to determine the applicable standard for ductile iron flanged 
> fittings AND whether or not such fittings are permissible in the above ground 
> portion of the fire sprinkler system.  Specifically in the riser manifold. It 
> could be a flanged ductile iron tee or flanged ductile iron spool piece, etc. 
> 
> I heard that they are being used as I described.  So, I thought I'd look it 
> up to see if NFPA 13 allowed it.  And, none of the standards listed in the 
> acceptable materials table address ductile iron.
> 
> I'm comfortable with pointing to 1.7 as a "back up" justification.  But, any 
> more help would be appreciated.
> 
>     J. Scott Mitchell, PE
>        Fire Protection Engineer | 
>        Projects Engineering
>        CNS Pantex | 806.477.5883 | 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 2:29 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Ductile Iron Fittings
> 
> Scott,
> 
> Isn't 36.10M for Welded and Seamless pipe?
> B16.4  is for fittings.
> 
> R/
> Matt
> 
> Matthew J. Willis
> Project Manager
> Rapid Fire Protection Inc.
> *NEW ADDRESS*
> 1530 Samco Road
> Rapid City, SD 57702
> Office-605.348.2342
> Direct Line-605.593.5063
> Cell-605.391.2733
> Fax:-605.348.0108
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 7:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Ductile Iron Fittings
> 
> Thanks for all the responses. 
> 
> The reason is because NFPA 13 does not include ductile iron (ASME B36.10M) in 
> the acceptable materials table. My opinion is that it is functionally more 
> than adequate. 
> 
> Would this be covered by section 1.7 (2016) for alternate arrangements?
> 
>     J. Scott Mitchell, PE
>        Fire Protection Engineer | 
>        Projects Engineering
>        CNS Pantex | 806.477.5883 | 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
                                          
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to