Using NFPA 484 would be similar to using aluminum storage standards for 
bringing a B-747-8 in a building.

The lithium battery industry needs to address this in a reasonable manner. 

The aerosol industry did this. Maybe the lithium battery industry hasn't done 
this because they can see what the answers are likely to be. Lots of water. 
In-rack sprinklers. Vertical barriers every X lineal feet in racks. Minimum 
aisle widths. Maximum pile sizes for non-rack storage.




> On Feb 26, 2016, at 10:17, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Storing lithium in a battery is probably different.
> Anyone see the guy on the news in a convinience store a few days ago whose
> e-cigarette went haywire in his front jeans pocket?
> It looked like a blowtorch!
>> On Feb 26, 2016 12:08 PM, "michael G" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Would the lithium battery storage fall under the requirements of storage in
>> NFPA 484? This does address lithium storage, but not lithium battery
>> storage.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Michael Goodis
>> Estimator, Project Manager
>> IL#000635   NICET#135586
>> Key Fire Protection Enterprises LLC
>> 3200 Mike Padgett HWY
>> Augusta, GA 30906
>> Office- (706)790-3473
>> Cell- (706) 220-8822
>> Fax: (706) 738-2119
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of David Blackwell
>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:32 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Lithium battery storage
>> 
>> FYI - In case some of you were not aware, the term has changed to SDS and
>> the requirements for the forms being produced now have changed.
>> See the OSHA website at
>> https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/effectivedates.html
>> 
>> The following section of text was extracted [in part] from a document
>> linked
>> from the main OSHA HCS page at
>> https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/:
>> 
>> The Hazard Communication standard (HCS) has been revised to align with the
>> United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of
>> Chemicals (GHS Revision 3, 2009). This includes updates to the requirements
>> for labeling and for safety data sheets (SDSs).
>> [...]changes in enforcement due to the release of the revised HCS published
>> in the Federal Register on March 26, 2012. The revised standard changes
>> "hazard determination" to the specific requirements for hazard
>> classification of chemicals, standardizes label elements for containers of
>> hazardous\ chemicals, and specifies the format and required content for
>> SDSs. [...] Chemicals must be evaluated in accordance with specific
>> guidance
>> outlined in Appendices A and B of the standard. The hazard classification
>> will result in the specification of pictograms, signal word, hazard
>> statements, and precautionary statements which must be included on the
>> labels. Specifications for these label elements are provided in Appendix C
>> of the standard. The SDSs will have a standardized 16-section format (see
>> Appendix D of the standard) and includes the information from the hazard
>> classification (e.g., hazard class, pictogram).
>> 
>> 
>> Respectfully,
>> 
>> David Blackwell
>> 
>> David Blackwell, P.E.
>> Chief Engineer
>> (803)896-9833
>> 
>> Office of State Fire Marshal
>> 141 Monticello Trail | Columbia, SC 29203
>> http://scfiremarshal.llronline.com/
>> (803)896-9800
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of [email protected]
>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:57 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Lithium battery storage
>> 
>> *** SCDLLR NOTICE *** This email is from an external email address. Please
>> use caution when deciding whether to open any attachments or when clicking
>> links inside the email.
>> 
>> You have to look at a consensus amongst data, not just one MSDS or not just
>> one study.
>> 
>> In this particular case there are no absolutes, no guarantees of any
>> results.  Take the info provided and use that to make your best case for a
>> methodology.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Craig L. Prahl
>> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
>> CH2MHILL
>> Lockwood Greene
>> 1500 International Drive
>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
>> [email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of å... ....
>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:52 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Lithium battery storage
>> 
>> Do we realize who writes those MSDS ?   Although MSDS content has gotten
>> better over the years... just saying think about the quality of analyses in
>> some of those MSDS's.
>> 
>> This commodity is non-standardized territory.
>> If ecological considerations are a factor, then dump loads of water
>> warrants
>> a second look.
>> 
>> We might be able to guarantee control of a Li-battery fire with lots of
>> water, but until we get *LOTS* of water, we can't guarantee extinguishment
>> using water only, either.
>> 
>> The engineers at Boeing probably have some experience with suppressing
>> Li-battery fires.   Even though 'in safety there should be no secrets...'
>> tell that to the economists.
>> 
>> 
>> Scot Deal
>> Excelsior Risk/Fire Engineering
>> Scot Deal
>> Excelsior Risk/Fire En
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to