No, lithium and lithium batteries are two distinctly different hazards.

Craig L. Prahl 
Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29303
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of michael G
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 1:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lithium battery storage

Would the lithium battery storage fall under the requirements of storage in 
NFPA 484? This does address lithium storage, but not lithium battery storage.

Thanks,

Michael Goodis
Estimator, Project Manager
IL#000635   NICET#135586
Key Fire Protection Enterprises LLC
3200 Mike Padgett HWY
Augusta, GA 30906
Office- (706)790-3473
Cell- (706) 220-8822
Fax: (706) 738-2119



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of David Blackwell
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lithium battery storage

FYI - In case some of you were not aware, the term has changed to SDS and the 
requirements for the forms being produced now have changed.  
See the OSHA website at
https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/effectivedates.html

The following section of text was extracted [in part] from a document linked 
from the main OSHA HCS page at
https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/:

The Hazard Communication standard (HCS) has been revised to align with the 
United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of 
Chemicals (GHS Revision 3, 2009). This includes updates to the requirements for 
labeling and for safety data sheets (SDSs).
[...]changes in enforcement due to the release of the revised HCS published in 
the Federal Register on March 26, 2012. The revised standard changes "hazard 
determination" to the specific requirements for hazard classification of 
chemicals, standardizes label elements for containers of hazardous\ chemicals, 
and specifies the format and required content for SDSs. [...] Chemicals must be 
evaluated in accordance with specific guidance outlined in Appendices A and B 
of the standard. The hazard classification will result in the specification of 
pictograms, signal word, hazard statements, and precautionary statements which 
must be included on the labels. Specifications for these label elements are 
provided in Appendix C of the standard. The SDSs will have a standardized 
16-section format (see Appendix D of the standard) and includes the information 
from the hazard classification (e.g., hazard class, pictogram).


Respectfully,

David Blackwell 

David Blackwell, P.E.
Chief Engineer
(803)896-9833

Office of State Fire Marshal
141 Monticello Trail | Columbia, SC 29203 http://scfiremarshal.llronline.com/
(803)896-9800

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lithium battery storage

*** SCDLLR NOTICE *** This email is from an external email address. Please use 
caution when deciding whether to open any attachments or when clicking links 
inside the email.

You have to look at a consensus amongst data, not just one MSDS or not just one 
study.

In this particular case there are no absolutes, no guarantees of any results.  
Take the info provided and use that to make your best case for a methodology.



Craig L. Prahl
Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29303
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of å... ....
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Lithium battery storage

Do we realize who writes those MSDS ?   Although MSDS content has gotten
better over the years... just saying think about the quality of analyses in 
some of those MSDS's.

This commodity is non-standardized territory.
If ecological considerations are a factor, then dump loads of water warrants a 
second look.

We might be able to guarantee control of a Li-battery fire with lots of water, 
but until we get *LOTS* of water, we can't guarantee extinguishment using water 
only, either.

The engineers at Boeing probably have some experience with suppressing
Li-battery fires.   Even though 'in safety there should be no secrets...'
 tell that to the economists.


Scot Deal
Excelsior Risk/Fire Engineering
Scot Deal
Excelsior Risk/Fire En
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to