Hi Roland,


I’m a little confused (no big surprise).  I just went back to look at the Globe 
IC and it appears to be listed for 60”.  Am I missing something in your post or 
in their listing?



Thanks,

Cliff Whitfield



From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Roland Huggins
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction



you do not go to the floor below the ceiling in determining the applicable 
height.  Below the ceiling is treated as a totally separate portion of the 
system with its own design basis.  The only exception to this is when your 
ceiling is not solid like a metal grated mezzanine floor or your using the pipe 
schedule and serving both areas with the same BL.



As for the CC sprinklers (and other mfgs), they are actually listed for NO MORE 
THAN 36 inches.  This can be a problem when there is a long run and a 2 in 12 
slope.  The 2019 ed will allow it to protect the higher area as well.



Roland



Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering

American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives

Dallas, TX

http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/>







On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Taylor Schumacher <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:



Thanks for the responses. The concealed space is 4’ to 6’ in areas and is above 
a convention center, so if we count to the floor we exceed the 20’ max ceiling 
height. Wasn’t aware of the CC sprinklers allowing 60 inch spacing but draft 
stopping an area this big makes me cringe. We were able to respace the 
sprinklers and got the calculation to work.



TAYLOR SCHUMACHER, CET

Security Fire Sprinkler

P  320.656.0847  |  F  320.656.0312  |  E   <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]



From: Sprinklerforum [ <mailto:[email protected]> 
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John 
Corcoran
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 8:56 AM
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction



Some input from our tech team:



While NFPA 13 "requires" that specially tested and listed sprinklers be used in 
combustible concealed spaces 36" and less, the special listed sprinklers are 
not required for spaces greater than 36". Standard coverage, QR sprinklers 
would be allowed, and the area reduction would also be allowed ( Light Hazard 
space?). Globe does offer a specially listed "IC" sprinkler for spaces to 
depths to 60" and the possibility of utilizing CPVC pipe ( See technical data 
sheet for specifics of when CPVC can be utilized). The calculation area is 
typically 1000 sq. ft. with draft curtains being required.

Kevin Maughan

Globe Sprinkler Corporation

Cell - 401-234-3967

Sent from my iPhone



And from Karl Wiegand:

While the Tyco CC 3 also has the increased 60 inch vertical protection area 
listing; it should be noted that the Reliable KFR CCS is listed to be used in 
areas that are 36 inches in height or less.







John Corcoran



From: Sprinklerforum [ <mailto:[email protected]> 
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cliff 
Whitfield
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 6:12 PM
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]
Subject: RE: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction



I was thinking that the standard changed to 60” but I may be mistaken or on 
another planet.  I don’t have 2016 in front of me.  I know 2013 allows using 
SSU once it exceeds 36”.



I’m not sure how the cost compares to QR SSU but I do know that there are 
sprinklers listed for CCS up to 60” deep with 16 x 16 spacing on the market now.



Cliff Whitfield



From: Sprinklerforum [ <mailto:[email protected]> 
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Travis 
Mack, SET
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 5:51 PM
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction



I think he is saying that his concealed space is >36" in depth.  If so, then 
specially listed are not mandated.

If so, I have always used the QR reduction for 10' ceiling height in those 
spaces provided it is a wet system.  I have had some AHJs require I go to the 
floor to get my deck height.  So, if you were 14' floor to floor with a 10' 
ceiling and 24" open web floor trusses, then you could use QR SSU to protect.  
A conservative approach would be to go with 14' for your QR reduction point.

Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
 <mailto:email:[email protected]> email:[email protected]

 <http://www.mfpdesign.com/> http://www.mfpdesign.com
 <https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692> 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
Send large files to us via:  <https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign> 
https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign
LinkedIn:  <https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack> 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack

On 10/13/2016 2:26 PM, Cliff Whitfield wrote:

Taylor,



I believe you will need to use Concealed Space Sprinklers for that area and 
will need to calc based on the manf data sheet.



Cliff Whitfield, SET

President

Fire Design, Inc.





From: Sprinklerforum [ <mailto:[email protected]> 
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Taylor 
Schumacher
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:55 PM
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]
Subject: Combustible Concealed Space-Area Reduction



Good afternoon forum,



I’m looking to apply the remote area reduction per 11.2.3.2.3.1 in NFPA 13 2010 
to a floor truss space over 36” using quick response, standard spray sprinklers.



Could anyone tell me if my assumptions are right?



TAYLOR SCHUMACHER, CET

Security Fire Sprinkler

P  320.656.0847  |  F  320.656.0312  |  E   <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]





  _____


 
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 www.avast.com






_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
 <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]
 <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org> 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org





  _____


 
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
 www.avast.com



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
 <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]
 <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org> 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org





---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to