On 21 March 2017 at 07:44, Evgeny Khramtsov <[email protected]> wrote: > Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:40:26 +0100 > Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd like to continue using them for ISR-SASL2 because I don't think >> they cause any issues. > > I'm ok with that, but only if there is a standard prefix name, like > "isr" in your case and using of other prefixes is forbidden for this > namespace. Otherwise, interoperability problems will come.
I think if you do this (or rely on it), then we'll also hit different interop issues - a large number of XML serializers cannot preselect namespace prefixes. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
