On 21 March 2017 at 08:06, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20.03.2017 22:32, Dave Cridland wrote: >> Loosely, this is OK, but, in order: >> >> 1) Section 6 must go. … This issue is a blocker for me. > > I don't have much hope, but have to ask anyway: Would you consider a > dual approach where we keep section 6, get the XEP into experimental > while simultaneously work on creating a suitable SASL mech at the IETF? > > Alternatively, if we remove section 6, would you accept ISR as is?
I'd be more comfortable with removing it for now. I'd also like to see the namespaced attributes go, but otherwise it's a good start point. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
