On Sa, 11.08.2012, 13:06, Alexander Wolf wrote: > Hi Georg > > 2012/8/11 Georg Zotti <[email protected]>: >> I would not call a version 1.0 before fixing the DeltaT issue, which is >> not so hard, technically. There are accepted models for it, and would >> solve many of the questions regarding solar eclipse accuracy. There are >> at >> least two branches started on the topic, what is their state? I can try >> to > > First committer was Matthew but he drop development :( I'm get his > code, fix some errors and add some improvements and extensions to > code. Now that code can calculate DeltaT but - it's a very important > question - I don't know how correctly apply those calculations. :( >
OK, that means I should start from branch https://code.launchpad.net/~stellarium/stellarium/deltat, right? There are so many seemingly abandoned branches, any way to clean up? >> What are the current Qt requirements, 4.7, 4.8.0, 4.8.1? There were some > > Current trunk can run with Qt since version 4.6.0 (but better use 4.7 > or 4.8), for new core need Qt 4.8.0 or better. So, may I propose to have Qt4.8 as requirement for 0.12, and Qt5.0 for Stellarium 1.0. Note then (we have discused this previously) that with Qt5 older or cheap (like N450 Atom netbooks) systems not capable of OpenGL (ES) 2.0 will no longer be able to run Stellarium. For these systems, 0.12.x may be the final edition then. Kind regards, Georg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Stellarium-pubdevel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/stellarium-pubdevel
