Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________
 
 
Where in any post has anyone even suggested that they drive the speed
limit in the right lane on 35 to block other drivers?  I have only seen
reference to driving the speed limit in the right lane to allow access
to northbound 35E in DT and driving the speed limit in the left lane.
An offshoot of this need to "stake your access lane early" might be to
block speeders but it is not the primary goal.  It is a pretty big leap
from what the posts on this subject to "highway vigilantism."

No matter how anyone tries to put the responsibility of dangerous
driving on others it remains the responsibility of the driver.

It seems like closer reading of posts might be in order.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mary C. Zanmiller
West Seventh Neighborhood
Saint Paul, MN USA

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Erickson
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:32 PM
To: St. Paul Issues Forum
Subject: Re: [StPaul] Impeding others

Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________
 
 
>>  Re: The practice of driving at the exact speed limit in the
>>      right lane, to prevent speeders from breaking the law.
>>      Specifically on 35E in St. Paul.

Let me put forward one alternative viewpoint on this topic. I don't 
know if I'm right on this, but I think that this is an opinion worth 
considering and I welcome private or public responses.

While, I support the existing speed limit on 35E and hope that 
drivers understand the deep and divisive history behind it, before 
flaunting it (which I MAY had done myself from time to time).

I think that there are also serious concerns about this kind of 
highway vigilantism, which I MAY also have engaged in from time to 
time (my pet peeve, drivers who ignore the lane ending signs and 
speed to the front of the line before merging).

While, it might "FEEL GOOD" to block speeders in the right lane, I'm 
not sure that this is an effective or healthy strategy for dealing 
with the issue. First of all, there are safety issues. Getting other 
drivers angry might feel good, but its also dangerous for you and for 
other innocent drivers on the road. The driver that you "piss off" 
(for whatever GOOD reason) may very well be the driver that causes an 
accident several miles down the road as he/she works off his/her 
anger with unsafe driving practices. This kind of driving has and can 
lead immature and rude drivers to take unnecessary risks to get past 
you. They might try passing on the left or even using the shoulder to 
get by, while these options are both/either unsafe or illegal, it 
will make little difference after a devastating car crash.

Finally, I doubt that any real good is accomplished by this kind of 
behavior. Does anyone really believe that blocking traffic is going 
to result in anything other than a momentary change in driving 
behavior. While, the "bad karma" that this kind of "vigilantism" will 
cause, is likely to linger and carry over for hours or longer as the 
angry motorist goes about his/her day. How many innocent victim will 
suffer later in the day, because one of us choose to irritate an 
unreasonable motorist?

I think that modeling good driving behavior and engaging in public 
awareness campaigns, or encouraging a higher level of enforcement are 
more likely to have a lasting impact and less likely to contribute 
towards the collective high blood pressure that plagues our society.

Just my opinion - subject to change on a whim or as the result of a 
more reasonably presented argument.

Best wishes,

Tim Erickson
Hamline Midway
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
=================================================
Tim Erickson              http://www.politalk.com
St. Paul, MN - USA                   651-643-0722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                   ICQ: 105978430
=================================================



_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/



_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to