On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:13 PM, Brian Lawson wrote: > It's just too bad that there isn't any way to vote for "None of the > Above". That leaves only the option of voting for the least > undesirable choice. Of course if NotA was a choice what the hell > would we do when it was the winner of the election? > -- > Brian > > On Oct 13, 2008, at 11:01 PM, Ian Sutherland wrote: > >> I doubt there'll be any changes of note from anybody. Systems >> like ours resist change by nature. >> >> This fellow seems to agree. Warning: British Obama Supporter... >> >> <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1077345/Ive-lost-faith- >> The-Messiah-How-EDWARD-HEATHCOAT-AMORY-lost-Obama-mania.html>
I think a shorter primary season with set regional schedules that rotate (as proposed by Lieberman and some other Senator whose name I can't recall), and a more honest, fair and thorough press would be much better than the opportunity to vote NOTA. BTW, the British press has done more to look into Obama's past than their American counterparts. Gerard Baker is one journalist that comes to mind. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
