True, but it took IDE about 10-years to catch up. IIRC SCSI does have one advantage in that since the controller is on the drive instead of the card (i.e. IDE), SCSI does use less processor power. Might have been a big deal when we were dealing with 25MHz IIci's, but not noticeable with today's machines.
-Robyn On Sunday, December 22, 2002, at 05:07 AM, Will Schou wrote: > compared to the IDE drives. Most of the die hard SCSI snobs have > changed their ways in the last couple of years. ;-) Will S > Who once thought IDE drives were for PC dummies only ;-) -- SuperMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | Service & Replacement Parts [EMAIL PROTECTED] | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> SuperMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/supermacs/list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/supermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- >The Think Different Store http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
