--- Will Schou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
> If you've got money to burn then sure you can buy a SCSI PCI card
> and 
> SCSI hard drive that will likely be "better" then the ATA PCi card
> and 
> IDE drive. But It's going to cost you twice as much and the drive
> will 
> be smaller most likely.
> IDE drives are better then they used to be and they are big and
> cheap 
> and plenty good enough for most of us. My old SCSI 50 pin drives
> that 
> came with the UMAX still run just fine but they are loud and slow 
> compared to the IDE drives.  Most of the die hard SCSI snobs have 
> changed their ways in the last couple of years. ;-) Will S
> Who once thought IDE drives were for PC dummies only ;-)

   They still are! Just that level of Dumminness is not stationary
either:) EIDE is a cheap hack compared to SCSI, but it's getting
better.  The main trouble is that few of manufacturers follow the
standards to the letter.  But if it works for you and does everything
you need, by all means use it and reap the economical benefits.  Why
not?  If you need true multitasking, multithreading reliability for
any period of time longer than a few minutes, then you may look into
hardware more closely.  Probably, professional audio-video production
work fits the bill.  I had to replace a so called server from Dell
recently by a 9 y o old SUN SS20 box outfitted by 2 SCSI drives from
my S900, old 75 MHz SuperSparc II and 128 MB RAM.  Takes close to 80k
hits a day (all static), which is nothing spectacular except that it
beats 2001 vintage Dell PowerEdge in reliability: we had unbearably
frequent powerdowns -> downtime.  So, it all depends on your tasks at
hand and the environment.  For fun Corvette is fine, but if you start
dropping 40 ton bricks in its luggage trunk it will not survive.
That's were rocket-launcher vehicle or a 60 ton truck is needed.  I
will move slower, but it will move non-stop.  With modern SCSI
technology you can achieve both :  speed and scalabilty.  The
question is: who needs it?  
Comparisons of old SCSI to the latest EIDE are as valid as the
comparisons by Linux bigots of their tools to MS-DOS they still call
Windows.  Remember though that IDE is a cheapo hack designed to
emulate SCSI years ago. Btw, Apple's reliabilty problems grew
drastically after they dropped SCSI and put poorly designed hardware
into poorly designed half-cooked Performa 600 and everything that
came in later.  Used to be one could count that Apples last 2-3 times
longer than Intels, now they push us with their crappy hardware
designs and beta OS to pay on a more frequent basis. Don't get me
started on why they they put this wonderful CPU chip on that horrific
chipset.  Clock per clock G4 can do 8 times more work than any Intel,
yet they are hampered by the chipsets and total lack of vectorised
software.  All good developers are gone where the money is.


Anyway,  no matter what, Merry Christmas :)

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

-- 
SuperMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 Service & Replacement Parts   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

SuperMacs list info:    <http://lowendmac.com/supermacs/list.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/supermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>


---------------------------------------------------------------
>The Think Different Store
http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com
---------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to