On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:22 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:08:40 -0800, Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: >>> Philip Chee wrote: >>>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:37:01 -0500, Ed Mullen wrote: >>>>> Anyone have any general notions on extension compatibility for SM 2.x? >>>>> What Firefox extensions are likely to work? Some? Many? Most? All? >>>> I have about 90+ extensions installed into this profile: >>>> <http://flickr.com/photos/aleytys/2540665085/> >>> thats fine and dandy, but what are the names of those >>> extensions? >> >> <http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html> >> <http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html> > > so, what you're saying is all those extensions that > worked for SM1, also work for SM2?
If the original extension worked in Firefox 3.0/3.1 then it's likely to work in SeaMonkey 2.0a2. If the original extension was never compatible with Firefox 3.0/Thunderbird 3.0x, then it's highly unlikely to work in SeaMonkey 2.anything. Phil -- Philip Chee <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. [ ]Anything not nailed down is a cat toy... * TagZilla 0.066.6 _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
