Ray K wrote:
>If I go here,
>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/02/14/A-Possible-Cure-for-Diabetes-Ignored-by-Big-Pharma.aspx,
>or to many other pages of the above site, vertical scrolling is strange,
>whether dragging the scrolling bar or using the mouse wheel.
>
As Arne pointed out, the page is a steaming pile.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/02/14/A-Possible-Cure-for-Diabetes-Ignored-by-Big-Pharma.aspx
It was constructed by a moron.

As Michael pointed out, the tool that was used was also garbage.
The moron using it also wasn't aware that
Web pages need to be validated against the W3C standard.

>I haven't observed this behavior at other sites;
>
Bookmark this link and next time you have a problem with a page,
feed its URL into the WorldWide Web Consortium's HTML Validator:
http://validator.w3.org

>it does not occur using Internet Explorer.
>
"IE Shines On Broken Code"
http://google.com/search?q=cache:7-myeaT_Ew4J:it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/19/0236213+IE.Shines.On.Broken.Code+rss+IE.was.dynamically.rewriting.my.JavaScript.replacing.the.incorrect.delimiters.with.the.correct.ones#10563498
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/thread/5433c73b8b814610/bab28202f8f2981f?q=zz-zz+slashdot-*+IE-Shines-On-Broken-Code+guesses

>Any idea about the cause of this odd annoyance?
>
Incompetent webmasters/developers.
(Just as you did, they use M$'s broken browser
to look at their garbage work and say "That works"
--when it is, in fact, a total mess.)

Professional Web developers despise Microsoft's software:
http://google.com/search?q=cache:1WVAWYE4mFQJ:linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/27/008227+*.*-formed-*+*.*-*-*-*-work-in-all-*-*+*-*.*-*-*-time-*-*-to-*-*-*-*-*-*-implement-*-*+*-*-PITA-*-*-*+*-*-costs-*-*-a-ton-*-*+*-*-painful-*+*-standards-compliant-browsers+*-*-*-get-your-site+*-*-works-in-one-*+*-render-*-in-IE+elegant+*-*-*-renders-properly-*-*-*-*+*-*.*-*.*-*.*-etc+mangle#26617861

>Are there internal settings in SM I can change to correct it?
>
The problem is NOT at *your* end.
Your standards-compliant browser isn't the problem.
Ignorant/lazy people using bad (M$ ?) tools are the problem.
http://google.com/search?q=cache:74WFzGYogbYJ:www.mozilla.org/projects/tech-evangelism/+there-is-more-than-one-browser-*-*-*+Learn.more+a.free.and.open.web+*-bottom-line+*-*-*-*-*-have-problems-*-*-*+*-modified+*-*-not-controlled-by-a-few+via+upgrade+CVS+Complaining-*-*-*+Page+standards.based
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to