On 7/4/11, Rufus <[email protected]> wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote: >> >>> No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a >>> search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers >>> that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even >>> found another one that I like better than Atomic...and I like Atomic >>> better than Safari. >>> >>> To say that Apple "won't allow" competing software on the App store only >>> tells me that you haven't done much surfing on the App store. Go look. >> >> Rufus, when you are in a hole, please stop digging. And please go >> educate yourself on the issue before continuing to sprout off. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Phil >> > > The premise that Apple "won't allow" is simply false - period. The you > don't want to swim in their pool?..fine. Just say so. But It's not > "impossible". Just flat not.
The app store guidelines disagree w/ you. http://www.cultofmac.com/heres-the-full-text-of-apples-new-app-store-guidelines/58590 2.17 Apps that browse the web must use the iOS WebKit framework and WebKit Javascript Can this thread die now? Please? Lee _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
