On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 02:02:18AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > >In any case, I don't see any reason to think that Freenet is illegal > >under current US or UK law. Whereas I see every reason to expect it to > >be criminalized under INDUCE - which is designed to make it easy to > >criminalize things like Freenet. However IANAL, and my opinions are > >based on third party analysis of INDUCE by somebody who is probably > >merely a law student or interested bystander. > > I have seen enough lawyers being completely wrong enough times to trust > my own judgment on the law before I blindly trust that of a lawyer. At > the end of the day, law is just a very long and rather inconsistent > instruction manual, it isn't beyond the comprehensive abilities of we > mere mortals, must as many lawyers would like us to think that it is.
Perhaps so. However personally I think you have such an insane level of optimism as to qualify as a disability. :) I'm sure you think the reverse of me. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
