On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 02:02:18AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
> >In any case, I don't see any reason to think that Freenet is illegal
> >under current US or UK law. Whereas I see every reason to expect it to
> >be criminalized under INDUCE - which is designed to make it easy to
> >criminalize things like Freenet. However IANAL, and my opinions are
> >based on third party analysis of INDUCE by somebody who is probably
> >merely a law student or interested bystander.
> I have seen enough lawyers being completely wrong enough times to trust 
> my own judgment on the law before I blindly trust that of a lawyer.  At 
> the end of the day, law is just a very long and rather inconsistent 
> instruction manual, it isn't beyond the comprehensive abilities of we 
> mere mortals, must as many lawyers would like us to think that it is.

Perhaps so. However personally I think you have such an insane level of
optimism as to qualify as a disability. :) I'm sure you think the
reverse of me.
> Ian.
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Support mailing list
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Reply via email to