I can empathize.  Freenet is is one of the first projects that I've seen take 
a working application and push it aside, while directing new users to an 
alpha version.  The way it would normally be done is listing Freenet 0.5 as 
the stable version instead of the "unsupported" version, and 0.7 as the alpha 
version still under development.  New users would opt for the stable version.  
Having new users directed to an alpha version while the stable version is 
fully functioning is quite strange.

On Saturday 19 August 2006 08:11, - wrote:
> Hi,
> I think you're making a mistake in forcing new people into the beta test
> freenet 0.7 instead of the established 0.5.
> You're forgetting how _highly_ someone new has to be motivated to try
> freenet, even version 0.5 which works and is not a beta test. Let's think
> about what would motivate someone...
> I remember when I found freenet, I installed it spent hours reading over
> the technical jargon.
> It was incredible slow. I removed it thinking this is a pile of crap that
> does not work.
> Only a few months later, did I again bother to go through this
> complicated process and after waiting for three days with it on, it finally
> started working.
> The reason I spent many hours and went back after throwing it out once, was
> because I was _highly motivated_ for the anonymity and content.
> Here's the problem:
> If 0.7 doesn't offer the anonymity and the content, plus it's an unstable
> beta test,
> why would anyone new bother to join the community?
> Do you think people are nice enough to offer their time and computers to
> beta test some random highly technical peer to peer application that
> completely hogs your computer's resources?
> The problem with freenet (even 0.5) is, it just isn't user friendly.
> A person who just stumbles on freenet does not know if it's actually going
> to work. After seeing how slow it is, most people, like myself will just
> get rid of it, not bothering to learn all the configurations, frost, fuqid,
> etc.
> If you took the time to create a simple, down-to-earth website and install
> program without all the technical jargon, you would double or triple your
> user base.
> The only NEW users you're going to get to freenet 0.7 are going to be
> peer-to-peer programming enthusiasts. And how many of those are there that
> don't know about freenet already?
> So instead of scaring all potential freenet users away, It would be wiser
> to just ask members of the freenet community to do the beta testing, and
> create a nice user friendly website for 0,5 until 0,7 is working. Even I
> would be willing to help create this website, and I'm sure many other
> people also would volunteer.
> Best Regards,
> Van

Reply via email to