Freenet works different. Accept it.
On 8/21/06, urza9814 at gmail.com <urza9814 at gmail.com> wrote: > > "Anyway, I won't argue on that because the decision is not in my hands. > The fact is that 0.7 is the only supported version and that it is the > future. Not linking to the current version and gripping to the old one > would be an interesting kind of suicide for a project that's a constant > work-in-progress..." > > Suicide? So the fact that gaim has 1.5 in their downloads section when > they have 2.0 beta 3 out is suicide? The fact that some Linux distros > still use the 2.4 kernel is suicide? Funny how they're all still here > and quite popular.... > Linking to 0.7 is suicide. New people come, download it, find there's > nothing there, and leave. And don't try again later. I understand that > there are good reasons behind developing the darknet....but for most > users looking at freenet, they're looking for an opennet. And they're > looking for a network up and running. They're not expecting something > that's just barely starting. > > On 8/21/06, Julien Cornuwel <batosai at batosai.net> wrote: > > urza9814 at gmail.com a ?crit : > > > > > .7 has very few users, very little content, and no opennet. > > > It's useless for new users. > > > > > > I'm not sure stopping linking it on the website would help it have more > > users. About content, I see new freesites apearing quite the same rythm > > as on 0.5 so it's just a matter of time for 0.7 to have as much content > > as 0.5. > > > > > And the security that you say is better has yet to be tested. I > > > > > > Where did I say that ? In "the same security level." ? > > AFAIK, "the same" is not equal to "better". Maybe I'm wrong. > > > > > wouldn't bet on something that's only been around for a few months vs. > > > something that's been slowly improving for...well, longer than I've > > > known freenet. > > > > > > Anyway, I won't argue on that because the decision is not in my hands. > > The fact is that 0.7 is the only supported version and that it is the > > future. Not linking to the current version and gripping to the old one > > would be an interesting kind of suicide for a project that's a constant > > work-in-progress... > > > > Regards > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Support mailing list > > Support at freenetproject.org > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > > > > -- > <HTML> > <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=57 > "><img > border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!" > src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/blank.gif > "/></a> > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subjectunsubscribe > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060821/d70a2e12/attachment.html>
