On 1999-10-18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Do work? Another vote for PTS. To be honest, I haven't seen PC-2000,
>but I suspect that most people would prefer it to PTS-DOS. From
>your posts, I also suspect *you* would prefer PTS. You're the judge
>of that; I still suggest taking the time to try them both.
>A PC-DOS 2000 user should chime in here to help you out. Certainly
>no danger of a flame fest or OS war from me; I don't believe in it.
>-
>boB
I am using PC-DOS. I don't do anything fancy, but it seems to be solid. It
is a little memory hungary, However. I have a lot of drivers because my
system is all SCSI, and than several other things. I don't get as much
conventional memory as I think I should.
I do like having an actual book for it, and I like not having the flakey
DRDOS memory manager.
It is a good Operating System.
>From the Unisys 386DX-33 of
Chad A. Fernandez in Battle Creek, MI USA
Net-Tamer V 1.12 Beta - Test Drive
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
