At 04:46 PM 1/25/03 +0000, you wrote:
>Charles Angelich wrote:
>>
>> If 'many' complained about a lack of JPEGs I would
>> think that means they were using it online and
>> wanted more graphics, not less?
>
>However, if JPEG-capability was their "bottom line"
>and they switched to another browser, then dropping
>GIFs will have no effect on them ('cause they ain't
>usin' it anyway).

I thought we were discussing BL2 on a ramdisk.  There
would be no room to "switch to another browser".

>> > There are just too many junk GIFs around to make it
>> > worthwhile (and all their tags clutter up the screen).
[...]
>You miss my point.  I'm talking about all the "formatting"
>GIFs that some sites use. [...]

Even Microsoft uses spacer.gif(s).  HTML is a half-baked
language controlled by geeks (WC3) who use Amaya as their
browser. What do you expect?

>No I don't (and I don't remember Trevor either).
>I guess remembering stuff is not my strong suit.

I remember Trevor, he was the tall one with the
braces.

My perception of BL is as an introduction to Linux, not
an end in itself.  As such, looking good is not a waste
of time.

Maybe there should be two versions.  One for Linux newbies
and another 'tomsrtbt clone' version for hard-core Linux
users to keep 'handy'?


Charles.Angelich "DOS Ghost"

Tech Website :
http://www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/
Music,Photos,Stories,etc. Website :
http://www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/faf/
Default Browser HomePage :
http://www.undercoverdesign.com/dosghost/homepage.asp

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to