Jim Leonard stated: > >BL wrote: >> I would propose a 2 changes to the scale: > >(I should warn you that changes to the scale were debated heavily for >months before being finalized. If the scale is constantly changing, >nobody will use it. Therefore, in order for a change to be made to the >scale, you would have to point out a significant flaw in logic or >definition.)
Yeah, and these discussions have a very familiar ring to them. I was going to go back and look at our discussion, but discovered the archive only goes back to late January 2003. I didn't realize we were losing access to messages as we went along. Glad I'm saving some of them for reference. -- Lee K. Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect' Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
