On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:08 +0000, Jonny Lamb wrote: > > * Mess with wbxml. I have some basic pure python wbxml that we could > > think about using, but i'm almost ashamed to admit it right now - not > > really had time for it and code is a messy port of some PHP > > Is that based on the PHP-based Exchange/Activesync server/application > that I was linked to from #synce? I definitely think this is important, > but perhaps not enough to work on before 0.11..
Do you have any more info on this? What php-based application are you refurring to? > > There is no "modern" way to sync 2003 devices. You seem to have to use > > ancient programs like a pre-opensync version of multisync. About 1 in > > 5 #synce requests is WM2003 related... That was a guess. Enough for it > > to bother me that we don't offer support any more :P > > So you think we should stop releasing specific WM2003 modules too > (synce-serial)? What exactly are the differences in syncing between WM2003 & WM5+? There are still alot of WM2003 devices out there (i'm one of them ;)) that work perfectly, dropping support of these seems premature, if i may say so. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list SynCE-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
