Sponsored by TWIST - Tablet Weavers International Studies & Techniques
I agree with Linda that Wikipedia can be very inaccurate. Last year I found the description under "Process" in the general Weaving section so pathetically misleading, that I rewrote it and see my words are still there! And the "History" jumps from a dubious description of Sumerian work to American Colonial via some bible quotes... So hardly comprehensive! I am nor sure of the value of Wikipedia if one is not given the standing of the contributors. Are they experts in that subject or just someone with a little knowledge and a PC? Without such information how can one trust any entry? But I applaud the idea of tablet weavers making sure that at least this entry is as correct as possible. There seems to be a mistake in practically every sentence as it stands.... including a seven-holed hexagonal tablet! Peter Collingwood Send private reply to "peter collingwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------------------------------------------------------- To stop receiving tabletweaving (not tabletweaving-digest), send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: unsubscribe tabletweaving. To stop receiving tabletweaving-digest, see the end of a digest.
