Le 22.05.19 à 12:06, Florian Lohoff a écrit : >> you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273023376 ? >> it's a good example of missing datas. >> no entrance, no way between the entrance and the public network. >> I feel that the relation type=navaids should be called type=missingway > > Again a footway between the house and a road will NOT help for > car navigation because for cars a footway is NOT a routable > part of the graph.
again multimodal app DO it (for e.g. switch footway with access=destination in a BRouter car profile, you may also add a weight despite i didn't known how to add a big weight for missing way) when datas are available, an application can choose to prefer the most complete routing to reatch a entrance even if a part is done by foot compared to a closer routing by car but for witch the routing till the destination is unknown and can therefore cross a barrier or anything that invalidates the routing. it's a matter of weight between the footway and the "no-way" and/or a test to avoid a routing between the last routed-by-car node and the destination through a barrier so first : - add missing datas that have already an osm tag - have an app that use those datas MAYBE AFTER that some additional datas are needed, but without using currently usable infos, our exemple get the reply "use eisting datas" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
