+1 to using man_made=carillon or =bells. Don’t use attraction because that is for carousels and roller coasters and similar things in amusement parks, mostly.
—Joseph Eisenberg On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:18 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 7. May 2020, at 16:26, [email protected] wrote: > > > > But maybe I will start a proposal with attraction=carillon for tagging > carillons which are operated as an attraction, but then the definition of > that has to be very clear, I think. > > > I am all for tagging carillons, if you like with all the details like > material, number of bells, melodies that are commonly played and at which > times, etc., but please do not use the “attraction” key. tourism=attraction > is a questionable tag (how would it be verified/what is an objective > criterion on distinguish between something being or not yet, an > attraction?), and it does generally more harm than help to describe the > world (because it renders a name and many people are not encouraged to push > it further and actually describe what the thing is). > > Just leave it open whether a carillon is an attraction or not, and map: > “here’s a carillon”. Suitable keys I would examine could be amenity or > man_made, there could also be a property like carillon=yes/no to indicate > there’s a carillon at a place (e.g. a tower). > If you are interested in tagging additional detail it seems better to > create a distinct object than adding a property to something else. > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
