I just had a quick look at the licence terms. While the license is based on CC by 4.0 (which is own can of worms) it unluckily contains a provision prohibiting specific use that makes the data clearly (as in we will never, in no circumstances be able to adhere to the terms) unusable for OSM and further means it does not meet the definition here http://opendefinition.org/od/1.0/en/.
Sorry Simon Am 07.12.2015 um 03:50 schrieb Daniel O'Connor: > Hi all, > Many of you may be interested in > https://blog.data.gov.au/news-media/blog/geocoded-national-address-data-be-made-openly-available > > Provided the license is CC-BY-3.0 or better; we already have explicit > permission to use said data: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/data.gov.au_explicit_permission > > For those of you interested in what specific data this is, I'd > encourage you to have a read of: > https://www.psma.com.au/sites/default/files/g-naf_product_description.pdf > > Of interest to us: > * Address points with geocoding and full structured address information > * Authoritive street names for a given suburb, with geocoding (points > though, not polylines) > * Authoritative suburb/locality points, geocoded - likely of better > accuracy than ABS "Statistic Suburb" data. > * Data refreshed quarterly; sourced from local and state government > (so emailing your council to submit a data correction from survey is > plausible) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
