Am 30.12.2015 um 12:56 schrieb Jason Ward: > Understood. For clarity that restriction means the Rights granted in > odbl Clause 3.1 [1] are not possible with this data. > > I can understand the restriction so I wonder if there is any scope for > this to be removed. > > I do wonder though, when does Licenced Data become Adapted Material? > I ask as the restriction applies to Licenced Data only. Probably a > question for the Commonwealth solicitors that wrote the EULA. > I suspect that the wording of 2a2 is a bit sloppy, and that the "to create" is intended to cover Adapted Material. In any case the way I understand the way this is supposed to work. is that the original IP rights (and the associated licence) continue to exist in a derived work so even if not stated explicitly 2a2 would still apply. Further there are a number of open issues with CC by 4.0 based licences that remain unresolved, see the discussion on legal-talk.in May 2015.
Simon > [1] - http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/ > > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 21:39 Simon Poole <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > 2a2 > > > Am 30.12.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Jason Ward: >> Hi Simon, >> >> Could you note the clause for clarity please? My guess would be >> 3a4 of [1] as I'm not across the meaning of that when applied to >> the downstream osm licence. I've read the links below and on a >> first pass it appears to be quite a broad licence to use >> (Specifically 2a 1B & 2a 1B) of [1] so am curious to know where >> the barrier lies. >> >> [1] >> - >> https://www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/EULA_open_G-NAF_administrative_boundaries.pdf >> >> [2] >> - >> https://www.dpmc.gov.au/pmc/about-pmc/core-priorities/public-data-branch-within-dpmc/geocoded-national-address-data-be-made-openly-available >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 20:53 Simon Poole <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> I just had a quick look at the licence terms. While the >> license is based on CC by 4.0 (which is own can of worms) it >> unluckily contains a provision prohibiting specific use that >> makes the data clearly (as in we will never, in no >> circumstances be able to adhere to the terms) unusable for >> OSM and further means it does not meet the definition here >> http://opendefinition.org/od/1.0/en/. >> >> Sorry >> >> >> Simon >> >>> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
