2a2 Am 30.12.2015 um 12:32 schrieb Jason Ward: > Hi Simon, > > Could you note the clause for clarity please? My guess would be 3a4 of > [1] as I'm not across the meaning of that when applied to the > downstream osm licence. I've read the links below and on a first pass > it appears to be quite a broad licence to use (Specifically 2a 1B & 2a > 1B) of [1] so am curious to know where the barrier lies. > > [1] > - > https://www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/EULA_open_G-NAF_administrative_boundaries.pdf > > [2] > - > https://www.dpmc.gov.au/pmc/about-pmc/core-priorities/public-data-branch-within-dpmc/geocoded-national-address-data-be-made-openly-available > > > Thanks! > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 at 20:53 Simon Poole <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > I just had a quick look at the licence terms. While the license is > based on CC by 4.0 (which is own can of worms) it unluckily > contains a provision prohibiting specific use that makes the data > clearly (as in we will never, in no circumstances be able to > adhere to the terms) unusable for OSM and further means it does > not meet the definition here http://opendefinition.org/od/1.0/en/. > > Sorry > > > Simon > >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
