I can agree with the last sentence, but not much else.
I think most of the people in this thread genuinely want to work with
the various parks services to get OSM solutions that work for both parks
and the OSM community.
We don't currently have any good communication channels.
If we can get the right lines of communication - which is difficult when
you have OSM and NPWS being both distributed and bureaucratic in their
own ways - I'm confident that we will be able to get outcomes that
everyone is happy with.
Tom
----
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
On 29/02/2024 10:42 pm, Adam Steer wrote:
Thanks Tony.
The first crux as I see it is that the OSM community doesn't listen. It is
unable to hear values other than some abstract academic notion of map
purity.
The second crux is that OSM mappers are not responsible or accountable for
anything. So taking the view that "everyone should come to OSM and justify
themselves" is pretty weird and backwards.
What about taking the approach "ok land managers what can we do to help
you?" And if the answer is "stop reverting parks service edits", then
respect that ...
A better map isn't one with all the everything. It's one made respectfully
and responsibly.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
